USF's WebQuest
Investigating the Civil Rights of the Mentally
Ill
A webquest for 11th & 12th grade psychology students
Designed by: David ValdÈz
Dvaldez@phuhs.org
Introduction
Understanding abnormal behavior is a difficult process. After all, what is
abnormal to one group may be perfectly normal to another. The terms themselves,
ënormalí and ëabnormalí, are pejorative.
In
addition, some mental disorders which seem abnormal in one culture may not even
exist in another. Are they true disorders then or are they socially constructed?
Are those suffering with mental disorders extraordinarily creative or really in
psychological pain?
The
answers to these questions are controversial and often times unsettling. Yet,
once a client is given a diagnosis, the label sometimes haunts their personal
lives. The stigma associated with mental disorders are often more detrimental
than they are helpfulóand it is the client who continues to suffer from the
label.
A person
who severely suffers from mental disorders are often institutionalize both for
research study and for their own health. But this institutionalization is often
a blurring of individual client rights. The client has limited privacy and the
treatments can very often be degrading. The clients, after all, are not
prisoners of the state, but are very much treated so in several instances. This
webquest will concern itself with the nature of abnormal behavior and the
marginalization of patient rights. Youíll want to attend to the treatment of
clients with mental disorders and possible violations of their civil rights
during their treatment.
Task
You and
your partners will review a variety of websites to read several articles. The
articles concern themselves with the psychology of dysfunctional behavior and
the issue of patient rights. You will read the articles in order to grasp the
controversy that surrounds the issues of patient rights in the care of mental
health institutions. You should reflect on the tensions involved and the
problems encountered by clinicians, families, and patients.
Be
prepared to discuss your thoughts with your partners and to share your
conclusions with the class. Note your sources so that you can justify your
conclusions during your class presentation.
Process
1.) You
will be assigned to groups of four. Two students should focus on the articles
that concern themselves with what is ëabnormalí in different cultures. Be sure
to note limitations of labeling someone with a disorder and the challenges that
might ensue. You should be prepared to discuss the issues of labeling with your
partners and to provide strengths and limitations for both sides of the
argument.
What
is Abnormal?
PDF-Psychology
of Mental Health Illness
PowerPoint-Abnormal Definitions and History
As you and
your partner review these materials, it will be useful if you can respond to the
following questions:
…
What
considerations are most significant when diagnosing someone with a mental
disorder?
…
What
limitations are inherent in applying labels to dysfunctional behavior? Can
someone overcome such stigmas?
…
Describe
the cultural/ethnic/gender limitations involved in labeling a dysfunctional
behavior.
The two
other students will focus on the articles that concern themselves with patient
rights. You should be able to support both sides of the argument and be prepared
to share with your group members an outline of the arguments.
More Care for Mentally
Ill? by Michael Jonathan Grinfeld. June 2000, Vol. XVII, Issue 6
Mental Illness and
the Law
Principles for the Provision of
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Treatment Services
The US
Bill of Rights
As you and
your partner review these materials, it will be useful if you can respond to the
following questions:
…
What
client rights are violated during an institutionalized stay?
…
Which of
these client right violations are guaranteed by the US Bill of Rights?
2.) Once
youíve read the articles for your group, be sure to discuss your findings with
each other. One group member should take notes about the effects of labeling and
another group member should take notes on the issue of patient rights. All four
members should have a grasp of the essential issues in order to discuss later
with the class at large.
3.) A
third group member should write down the notes on how the group synthesizes the
material into a larger picture. Formulate and justify a response to each of the
following questions which draw from the online articles as well as class notes:
…
How would
you articulate the struggle to protect the patient rights of the mentally ill?
…
What civil
rights are compromised when a client is hospitalized? Whoís being protectedÖthe
client or the public?
…
Is the
marginalization of the clientís rights worth the sacrifice for the well-being of
the general public?
4.) A
fourth member should be able to represent the group and share its findings and
conclusions with the class. In addition, the group may also pose questions it
finds are critical to understanding the issue of diagnostic labels and patient
rights.
Evaluation
Rubric
|
Fair
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
|
Completed all
work on time |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Worked
cooperatively |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Stayed on task |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Used computer and
books as resources |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Documented
sources |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Wrote clear,
coherent, and detailed information |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Presented to the
class |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Organized
information logically |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
The Rubric
above will be used to assess the quality of your work on the Webquest. In
addition to the rubric, however, please answer the questions below in your
reflection journal:
1.) What
have you learned about labeling someone with a mental disorder?
2.) What
amendments (if any) would you suggest to the Bill of Rights?
3.) What
new questions have been generated from your research?
4.) What could be improved in the Webquest
activity?
Conclusion
The struggle
to protect the rights of the mentally ill is a difficult task. Clinicians need
to protect the client and the public, but in doing so, they often marginalize
the civil liberties guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. The challenge of
maintaining the level of care needed to provide effective treatment is often
compromised by the need to respect patient rights.
The issue is further complicated by the task of
assigning diagnostic labels to patients with mental illness. Despite the stigma
of certain labels, they do provide a valuable service in the treatment strategy
of clients. Although the struggle is not easy to resolve, the questions we ask
and the research we conduct, help to frame important questions that are
necessary to progress the industry of psychology and to protect the best
interest of clients.