The
1. Course prefix and number: SCE
4237 (4
credits)
2. Course title: SCIENCE /
TECHNOLOGY / SOCIETY INTERACTION
3. Regular instructors: Dr. Barbara S.
Spector
4. Course prerequisites:
(none)
5. Course description: Achieve an
historical and philosophical understanding of 1) the nature of the scientific
enterprise: interaction of science, technology, and society (STS), (2) how to
teach STS including the use of computers and related technologies, and (3)
intricacies of sample STS topics.
This course
develops studentsí awareness of science and technology as human enterprises that
take place in a social, environmental, and historical context. Various interactions of science,
technology, and society are explored in the context of STS issues relevant to
the learners. The learner
constructs a grounded theory about the nature of the interaction of Science,
Technology, and Society and its role in science education reform. The instructor models constructivist
teaching strategies. The goal of the course is to enable learners to construct a
historical and philosophical understanding of (1) the nature of the scientific
enterprise, including the interaction of science, technology, and society ; (2)
the multiple dimensions and complexities of sample STS topics; and (3) how to teach STS to diverse
audiences. This course fulfills
four graduation requirements.1
6.
Course goals and objectives
The
participant will be able to
a)
describe the
nature of science from both current and historical
perspectives;
b)
describe the
nature of technology from both current and historical
perspectives;
c)
describe the
interaction of science and technology with each other and
society;
d)
construct an
understanding of the nature of the scientific enterprise including the role of
the interactions among science, technology, and society, and generate a grounded
theory of
STS;
e)
use STS as
the context to help learners construct basic science
concepts;
f)
use a
constructivist approach to teach diverse student audiences about the nature of
the scientific enterprise and the interaction of science, technology, and
society;
g)
explain the
role of STS in the science
education reform movement.
7. Content
outline
(a) paradigm
shifts,
(b)
science
versus pseudo-science,
(c) academic
perspectives on STS,
(d)
historical
perspectives of STS interactions,
(e) New Liberal
Arts program,
(f)
current
environmental issues - hazardous waste
(g) technology
and psychology,
(h) the AIDS
dilemma,
(i)
site explorations,
(j)
multiple perspectives on STS in
schooling.
8. Evaluation of student
outcomes
Assessment
is embedded in instruction. Data for assessments will be collected from the
following tasks that the students are required to
complete:
a)
Participate
in a study group and in electronic mail discussions.
b)
Review STS
databases for publications, software, and videos.
c)
View the
video taped series Connections and The Day the Universe
Changed. Write responses to
questions handed out in class as part of your journal (see assignment # 9).
d)
Read all
print matter on the required reading list.
e)
Read two
books chosen from the New Liberal Arts monograph series and share the contents
of them with classmates. Be
thorough enough so that those who have not read the same books can speak
intelligently about the particular example of STS to their future
students.
f)
Develop and
present an action plan addressing an STS issue.
g)
Final
Project: Develop an original format to assess the degree to which you have
integrated information from the experiences in this course into your own
conceptual framework. Include your understanding of the scientific enterprise
and a plan for teaching STS. Share
this plan with the class as your final assignment. Be sure to include references to
material from all the assigned readings, video tapes, and computer
programs.
h)
Write
response papers (exit memos) for each class session.
i)
Keep an
extensive , reflective journal in which you integrate the meanings you
are constructing from your various experiences related to STS. Make a minimum of one entry each week.3
9. Grading criteria
Your grade
is based on the quality and quantity of your participation during on-campus and
off-campus sessions and the quality and quantity of assignments you
complete. One of the criteria used
to assess quality is your analytic, conceptual, and creative thinking as
expressed through your oral communications in class and in written assignments.
Consequently, attendance at all class sessions, for the entire session, is
required. Absences and tardiness
will be reflected in your grade.
Failure to return all materials that have been loaned to you will result
in a final grade of
ìFî.
10.
Textbook and readings
Aikenhead
(1992), The integration of STS into
science education. Theory into
practice, 31 (1), 27-35.
Association
for the Advancement of Science. (1989).
Science for all Americans.
NY:
American
Association for the Advancement of Science. (1994). Benchmarks for science
literacy. NY:
BSCS. (1991). Middle school science and
technology (program preview).
Carter, C.
(1991). Science-technology-society and access to scientific knowledge. Theory into practice , 30
(4), 273-279.
Hammond, A.
L. (Ed.). (1984). Century of the
sciences: Twenty discoveries that changed our lives. Science 84 ,
5 (9).
Hammond, A.
L. (Ed.). (1985) The next step: Twenty-five discoveries that could change our lives. Science 85, 6
(9).
Hurd, P.D.
(1991). Closing the educational
gaps between science, technology, and society. Theory into practice , 30
(4), 251-259.
Kuhn, T.
(1970). The structure of
scientific revolutions.
Monograph
Series of the New Liberal Arts Program. (1989) Stony
Nagasu, N.
(1992). What is STS approach:
Historical and practical background.
Bulletin of society of japan science teaching, 33 (2),
78-88.
Solomon J.
& Aikenhead, G. (1994) STS education: International perspectives on
reform. Ways of Knowing in Science series. NY; Teachers College,
Spector,
B.S. (1990) Community resources
for meaningful learning.
Spector,
B.S., and Lederman, N. (1990). Science and technology: Human
enterprises.
Spector,
B.S. (1991). Middle school and
STS: an ideal match. International journal of science
education.
Spector,
B.S. (1993). Order out of chaos: Restructuring schooling to reflect
society's paradigm shift. School
Science and Mathematics Association
93 ( 1), 9-19.
Yager,
R. (1990). The science/technology/society movement
in the
11(a) ADA
Statement: Students
with disabilities are responsible for registering with the Office of Student
Disabilities Services in order to receive special accommodations and services.
Please notify the instructor during the first week of classes if a
reasonable accommodation for a disability is needed for
this
course.
A letter from the USF Disability Services Office must accompany this
request.
11(b). USF Policy on Religious
Observances:
Students
who anticipate the necessity of being absent from class due to the observation
of a major religious observance must provide notice of the date(s) to the
instructor, in writing, by the second class meeting.
Attachment
1
College
of Education
Departmental Course Syllabus
1)
Rationale
for setting goals and objectives: what sources of information (e.g., research,
best practices) support the formulation and selection of course goals and
objectives.
Knowledge of how people learn science, the nature of science, and the reform movement in science education support the formulation and selection of course goals and objectives. The National Science Education Standards (NRC,1989) and Benchmarks for Science Literacy (AAAS,19940 and Learning How To Learn (Novak & Gowin, 1984) are key sources of information.
2)
List
the specific competencies addressed from the relevant national
guidelines.
3)
Are
there field-based experiences in this course? If so, please briefly indicate nature
and duration.
Yes. There are field-based experiences in this course. Students are required to be in schools for a minimum of 15 hours. They are to interact and observe science teachers and classes.
4)
Is
technology used in this course? If
so, please briefly indicate type of technology and how it is used to manage,
evaluate and improve instruction.
Our students provided opportunities to access and/or demonstrate use of
technology in instruction in this course?
If so, please briefly describe.
(See accomplished practice No. 12)
Yes. Students are required to communicate on e-mail and to use the Internet as a resource for S.T.S. related information and S.T.S. lesson plans.
5)
List
the specific competencies addressed from the
Standard
1: The student uses the scientific processes and habit of mind to solve
problems.
Standard
2: The student understands that most natural events occur in comprehensible,
consistent patterns.
Standard
3: The student understands that science, technology, and society are interwoven
and interdependent.
6)
Are
there any components of the course designed to prepare teacher candidate to help
K-12 students achieve the Sunshine State Standards? If so, please
identify.
All components of the course for designed to prepare teacher candidates to achieve the Sunshine State Standards relating to the nature of science & the nature of technology and their interaction with society.
Attachment 1
(contíd)
(For
|
1.0 describe the nature of science
from both current and historical perspectives; |
paradigm
shifts, science versus pseudo-science, |
Journals e-mail original
final project |
Practice
# 3 ñ Continuous Improvement Practice
# 4 ñ Critical Thinking Practice
# 8 ñ Knowledge of Subject
Matter |
|
2.0 describe the nature of technology
from both current and historical perspectives; |
paradigm
shifts, New Liberal Arts program, |
Journals e-mail original
final project |
Practice
# 8 - Knowledge of Subject
Matter Practice
# 12 - Technology |
|
3.0
describe the interaction of science and technology with each other and
society |
paradigm
shifts, academic perspectives on STS, historical perspectives of STS
interactions, |
Journals e-mail original
final project review
of data bases |
Practice
# 12 - Technology |
|
4.0 construct an understanding of the
nature of the scientific enterprise including the role of the interactions
among science, technology, and society, and generate a grounded theory
of STS; |
academic
perspectives on STS, historical perspectives of STS interactions,
technology and psychology, the AIDS dilemma, |
Journals e-mail original
final project Action
plan |
Practice
# 4 ñ Critical Thinking Practice
# 8 ñ Knowledge of Subject
Matter |
|
5.0
use STS as the context to help learners construct basic science
concepts |
current
environmental issues - hazardous waste |
Journals e-mail original
final project Action plan |
Practice
# 8 ñ Knowledge of Subject
Matter Practice
# 10 - Planning |
|
6.0 use a constructivist approach to
teach diverse student audiences about the nature of the scientific
enterprise and the interaction of science, technology, and
society; |
site
explorations, multiple perspectives on STS in
schooling. |
Journals e-mail original
final project Action
plan |
Practice
# 2 ñ Communication Practice
# 5 ñ Diversity Practice
#10 ñ Planning |
|
7.0 explain the role of STS in the science education
reform movement. |
site
explorations, multiple perspectives on STS in
schooling. |
Journals e-mail original
final project Action
plan |
Practice
# 8 ñ Knowledge of Subject
Matter Practice
# 12 - Technology |
ATTACHMENT
II
Departmental Course
Syllabus
Preprofessional Benchmarks
for the Accomplished Practices
Practice #1 --
Assessment: The preprofessional teacher collects and
uses data gathered from a variety of sources. These sources will include both
traditional and alternate assessment strategies. Furthermore, the teacher can identify
and match the studentís instructional plan with their cognitive, social,
linguistic, cultural, emotional, and physical needs.
Practice #2 --
Communication: The preprofessional teacher
recognizes the need for effective communication in the classroom and is in the
process of acquiring techniques which she/he will use in the
classroom.
Practice #3 -- Continuous
Improvement: The preprofessional teacher realizes that
she/he is in the initial stages of a life-long learning process and that self
reflection is one of the key components of that process. While her/his concentration is, of
necessity, inward and personal, the role of colleagues and school-based
improvement activities increase as time passes. The teacherís continued professional
improvement is characterized by self reflection, work with immediate colleagues
and teammates, and meeting the goals of a personal professional development
plan.
Practice #4 -- Critical
Thinking: The preprofessional teacher
is acquiring performance assessment techniques and strategies activities
designed to assist all students in demonstrating their ability to think
creatively.
Practice #5 --
Diversity: The preprofessional teacher establishes a
comfortable environment which accepts and fosters diversity. The teacher must demonstrate knowledge
and awareness of varied cultures and linguistic backgrounds. The teacher creates a climate of
openness, inquiry, and support by practicing strategies [such] as acceptance,
tolerance, resolution, and mediation.
Practice #6 --
Ethics: The preprofessional teacher adheres to the
Code of Ethics and Principles of Professional Conduct of the Education
Profession in
Practice #7 -- Human
Development and Learning: Drawing upon well established human
development/learning theories and concepts and a variety of information about students,
the preprofessional teacher plans instructional
activities.
Practice #8 -- Knowledge of
Subject Matter: The preprofessional teacher has a basic
understanding of the subject matter and is beginning to understand that the
subject is linked to other disciplines and can be applied to real world
integrated settings. The teacherís
repertoire of teaching skills include a variety of means to assist student
acquisition of new knowledge and skills using that
knowledge.
Practice #9 -- Learning
Environments: The preprofessional teacher understands the
importance of setting up effective learning environments and has techniques and
strategies to use to do so including some that provide opportunities for student
input into the processes. The teacher understands that she/he will need a
variety of techniques and is working to increase knowledge and
skills.
Practice #10 --
Planning: The preprofessional teacher
recognizes the importance of setting high expectations for all students. The preprofessional teacher works with
other professionals to design learning experiences that meet studentsí needs and
interests. The teacher candidate
continually seeks advice/information from appropriate resources including
feedback, interprets the information, and modifies her/his plans
appropriately. Planned instruction
will incorporate a creative environment and utilize varied and motivational
strategies and multiple resources for providing comprehensible instruction for
all students. Upon reflection, the
teacher continuously refines outcome assessment and learning
experiences.
Practice #11 -- Role of the
Teacher: The preprofessional teacher communicates and
works cooperatively with families and colleagues to improve the educational
experiences at the school.
Practice #12 --
Technology: The preprofessional teacher uses technology
as available at the school site and as appropriate to the learner. She/he provides students with
opportunities to actively use technology and facilitates access to the use of
electronic resources. The teacher
also uses technology to manage, evaluate, and improve
instruction.
1 This course fulfills four USF graduation
requirements: (a) science certification, (b) computer applications, (c) an exit
requirement in Major Works and Major Issues for the USFís general education
core, and (d) a portion of
3 The journal entries are used to satisfy Gordon Rule requirements, therefore must total at least 6,000 words.