|
Promoting
Resiliency for English Language Learners
Dr. Yolanda Padrón
Educational
resiliency has been defined as the heightened likelihood of success
in school and in other life accomplishments
despite environmental adversities brought about by early
traits, conditions, and experiences.
(Wang, Haertel, & Walberg,
1994, p. 46).
Dr. Padron started by stating that educators need to
focus on new instructional approaches for improving education
of English language learners (ELLs). The programs need
to specifically
address the needs of Latino students who are trying to
learn a new language. One approach is to examine students
who have
done well in school and have begun to use English effectively.
This approach focuses on ELLs from disadvantaged backgrounds
who are resilient and doing well in school. It differs
from others in that it focuses on what has worked in
contributing
to students’ success rather than on what has not
worked, and it identifies alterable factors that distinguish
resilient
and non-resilient students.
Dr. Padron discussed a case study that examined the effectiveness
of a teacher training resiliency program that was designed
to help teachers improve their classroom instruction,
students’ resiliency
behaviors, and students’ academic achievement.
It examined both resilient (academically successful)
and non-resilient
(academically unsuccessful) students and determined factors
that affect educational resiliency.
These factors included:
• The amount and type of interactions in the classroom process
between students and their peers and teachers
• The differences in school and learning environments
• The differences in the attitudes and self-esteem of the students,
as well as their future aspirations
• The amount of parent involvement
The intervention took place in an elementary school in a
metropolitan area in the South where over 90 percent of the
students were Latino. The teacher training included seven
instructional components:
• Improving classroom instruction
• Reciprocal teaching (an instructional procedure that engages
students and teachers in dialogue to help the students
comprehend the text)
• Culturally relevant instruction
• Five Standards of Effective Teaching (Pedagogy)
• Educational resiliency, i.e., helped teachers improve the
learning of non-resilient students as well as resilient
ones
• Feedback from observations and the learning environment instrument
administered
• Implementation of learning centers in the classrooms
Dr. Padron then explained the various instruments used to
study the students and teachers. According to the findings
of the study, in comparison to the control group, the students
in treatment classes:
• Were given better instruction by their teachers
• Reported a more positive learning environment
• Felt much higher cohesion, satisfaction, and teacher support,
and less friction
• Had significantly higher reading achievement gains
She also discussed concerns about the results.
Dr. Padron ended by saying that qualified staff development
for all teachers, as in this intervention, is one of the
keys to successful school reform. However, other projects
need to be implemented that focus on changing the entire
school climate so that teachers and administrators can create
more collaborative, supportive work cultures that enable
them to help students better.
|