| Other
People’s Stories: Learning about Urban Schools from
Students and Teachers
Mr. Gregory Michie
The strength of such detailed, up-close works of
particular classrooms of teachers is not in making broad
claims or generalizations. What they do, instead, is highlight
the unique, zoom in on individual experience and all its
complexity and unpredictability, help us understand small
corners of the world in ways other forms of research cannot.
Mr. Michie used examples from his experiences in teaching,
writing about teaching, and teacher education to show why
we need more up-close, detailed views of urban classrooms
and to hear the voices of the teachers and students directly,
many of whom are from minority backgrounds. He gave special
attention to the issue of white researchers attempting
to tell “other people’s stories.”
Historically, narratives about urban schools and teaching
against the grain of a broken educational system have usually
come from the perspectives of white people. Many have not
depicted the complexity of urban schools and have ignored
the perspectives of teachers of color. But even white teachers
who have tried their best to give an accurate picture have
still been representing the issues from their perspective
as white, which means in most cases “telling other
people’s stories.”
Rather than try to find a way out of this dilemma of perspective,
white researchers need to stay engaged in the complications
of their position and continually acknowledge that their
understanding is limited by who they are, where they are
from, and what they have known and not known.
Mr. Michie
learned from his earlier writing that it is important for
him as a white male researcher to point to his “location” not
only in the introduction, but also in the context of the
narratives he presents. However, this also necessitates
being careful that in pointing to his location it does
not become the primary focus and result in the loss of
the participants’ voices.
Mr. Michie also said that bringing the voices of teachers
to center stage is not just a methodological issue but
also a political one. We must hear accounts that contest
the accepted story lines about city schools and families
living in poverty. These accounts must be presented in
both scholarly and non-scholarly venues. Hopefully, this
visibility will help make everyone in our society more
accountable for the quality of education in urban schools.
|