|
Parent
Empowerment Lunch
Dr. Na'im Akbar
Our research emphasis, our question,
and our theoretical focus are on the few that failed…Why
hasn’t someone said, ‘How in the world did
the vast majority of these people do as well as they did?'
Dr. Akbar started by saying that we need to consider shifting
how we think about what we do in our research and practice
in working with culturally diverse groups in education. The
focus of our research tends to be on weakness, deficiency,
and the few people who have failed. We always ask “why aren’t
you performing according to the norm that we have set before
you got here?” Then we try to bring students up to the norm
in terms of performance and behavior.
We do not consider
the environmental reality of the culturally diverse groups
we are looking at and do not consider the trauma and stress
that they are operating under. We do not look at those who
have survived a difficult situation—one that is not familiar
to them—with great strength. And the fact is, the vast majority
of students perform reasonably well considering that the
learning environment is not positive and that Latino, Asian,
and African American students are in an educational system
that does not reflect who they are or their world or language.
What we need to ask is how the vast majority of people do
as well as they do, given their circumstances. We need to
ask what accounts for the success of the students who may
be average in their performance but are actually above average,
and in many cases exceptional, when you take into account
the environment they are in. We need to look at those who
are succeeding and ask what the source of their strength
is and understand their resilience. How, for example, have
African Americans kept from being completely hopeless and
depressed given how they have been treated historically and
currently in the U.S., e.g., it used to be prohibited to
teach literacy to African American children.
Dr. Akbar also
raised the question of whether or not cultural assimilation
for any group that has cultural integrity is a good thing.
Through assimilation, some of the positive aspects of those
cultures, e.g., the value of family for Latinos, get lost.
People lose their capacity to deal with difficult circumstances
and do well. We should look at characteristics of the unique
cultural strengths of groups and build on those strengths.
We
also need to appreciate the power of the “double consciousness,” that
is the empowerment that has come from the ability
to master multiple worlds. For example, a Latino
person
who speaks
Spanish but also understands English very well is
better equipped with his/her bilingual capacity than
a person
who speaks only one language. A person is more powerful
when
he or she is able to be comfortably connected and
anchored in both the culture of his or her heritage
and the
culture of his or her circumstance, and to make them
both fit
without sacrificing the best that he or she can be.
|