Unit VIl

Politics and Propaganda (go back)

(Chapters 23-26)

 

Government, religion, and other social institutions are considered in this unit.  Its purpose is to show the value of experimentation, rather than indoctrination.  Coercing obedience or gaining it through propaganda, Frazier asserts, ensures failure.  Experiments are the only way to answer questions about human nature and the optimal conditions for human life.

 

Summary

 

As the visitors enter the serving room for lunch, Frazier says that there is not much left to show them.  He wonders whether they have been impressed.

 

"'Impressed' is scarcely the word," says Burris.  "It's the most soul-shaking experience of my life."

 

But Frazier claims the success of Walden Two is not at all incredible.  "How could it possibly have failed?" he asks.  What impresses him is the fact that Walden Two is already in existence, here and now, in the middle of modern civilization.

 

"The Utopias have tended to be a bit out of things," Castle observes.

 

Excitedly, Frazier agrees and elaborates on the point.  "Utopia" in Greek means "nowhere, which Butler spelled almost backwards for his utopian novel, Erewhon.   Other utopian writers--Bacon, Bellamy, and Morris-imagined their communities in far-away places: undiscovered is­lands, lost colonies, centuries earlier, or at some unforeseen point in the future.

 

"Out of things, indeed!" he concludes.  "It's the first rule of the Utopian romance: 'Get away from life as we know it, either in space or time, or no one will believe you!"'

 

"The Good Life is waiting for us-here and now," he declares, emphasizing that the necessary techniques are available, both material and psychological, to develop full and satisfying lives for all humanity.

 

Castle claims that he still must solve the practical problems of politics, and a conversation en­sues about government, power, and human nature.  Governments based on force, Frazier claims, are using poor principles of human engineering.  The problem with governments is that they can­not-or do not-experiment, chiefly because they cannot admit doubt or ignorance.  An ideal government, says Frazier, would be based upon the science of human behavior.  Anarchy would not be successful because there is no such thing as innate goodness.

 

Frazier clarifies his position.  "I'm not arguing for no government at all, but only for none of the existing forms....For the first time in history we're ready for it, because we can now deal with human behavior in accordance with simple scientific principles."

 

 

58

 

 

"We have no truck with philosophies of innate goodness-or evil, either, for that matter, Frazier continues, describing the Walden Two outlook.  "But we do have faith in our power to change human behavior.  “We can make ourselves adequate for group living, he insists.  Originally he simply had faith in that premise, but he declares it's now a fact.

 

Then he proceeds to explain Walden Two's political position in relation to the rest of society.  All members vote in state and local elections, but they do not take an interest in outside politics.  Instead, the Political Manager researches the qualifications of the candidates in these elections and draws up the "Walden Ticket," whereupon everyone goes to the polls and votes for the can­didates who would best serve Walden Two, as identified by the Political Manager.  Thus, the mem­bers choose the best candidates for their purposes, yet they save time by having the Political Manager inform them about this complex matter.

 

The conversation turns to another institution, religion.  Walden Two, explains Frazier, is not a religious community because the conception of humanity does not come from theology but rather from scientific study.  There is no formal religious training although some practices of or­ganized religion are used to inspire group loyalty and to strengthen observance of the Code.  Such practices include Sunday meetings with some type of music and occasional readings-philosophi­cal, religious, or poetic.  These readings often prompt literary allusions in the speech of the com­munity.  The topics chosen for discussion usually concern self-control and social relations.

 

"But are you taking any active step toward world peace?" Castle asks.

 

"Any active step!" Frazier cries.  "Just this: we aren't making war!  We have no imperialist policy-no designs on the possessions of others-no interest in foreign trade except to encourage happiness and self-sufficiency."

 

No international expert, Frazier argues, really knows for certain what sort of society or govern­ment will produce peace.  These experts only make guesses, with no significant experimental tests. (Chapter 23)

 

As the group leaves the dining room Burris asks how the community deals with young people drawn away from Walden Two by the modernized world: the movie palaces, nightclubs and fancy restaurants.

 

"By indoctrination, I suppose," he says.

 

Frazier objects, replying that the community does not propagandize in favor of its way of life.  Instead, the members simply tell the children the whole truth.  They make sure that, along with the glamour, the children observe the saloons, the jails, and the homes for the indigents.  They help the children understand that the glamour and beautiful homes and landscapes are available only to a few and often at the expense of poverty and filth for many.

 

Burris asks again why indoctrination is not used at Walden Two, and Frazier replies that it would ensure failure.  It is impossible, he says, to propagandize and experiment simultaneously.  Therefore, Walden Two operates without propaganda.  To indoctrinate favorable attitudes toward Walden Two, he continues, would conceal symptoms of unrest which would be studied by the com­munity psychologists.  Walden Two should be naturally satisfying.  Happiness therefore is one of the measures of success of the community.

 

 

59

 

As this discussion draws to a close, Steve and Mary appear.  They have passed the medical exam and been accepted into the Walden Two community. (Chapter 24)

 

Burris, impressed with the pleasant atmosphere in Walden Two, decides to make his own in­vestigation of happiness.  To make sure the guests are not being deceived, he mingles with the members at tea time to take a sample of their behavior.

 

He lays out a plan which clearly illustrates his loyalty to scientific procedures, using an objec­tive sampling procedure.  He begins at the bottom of the Ladder at four o'clock and progresses to each successive stage, eavesdropping on the occupants of each alcove for exactly five minutes.

 

This survey of conversations in the Ladder leaves him dissatisfied.  He stops in several differ­ent areas, then goes to the lounges and reading rooms, still without finding signs of psychologi­cal problems.  Wandering aimlessly, he slips into a music room to listen to a string quartet accompanied by a pianist who is out of his line of vision.  The string players are young, competent, and poised; the pianist seems a little less capable.  At the conclusion of the piece, Burris discovers that the pianist is Frazier. (Chapter 25)

 

Walking back to his room, Burris believes that his survey has failed, and then he realizes that there was a flaw in his objectivity.  He was not out to collect facts but rather to find something wrong with Walden Two.  He feels he is caught in a difficult position, not ready to join Walden Two but unable to find anything clearly wrong with it.

 

He also decides that his survey was conducted improperly.  He had made it at a time when people should be happy.  Instead, he needs a longitudinal study.  He should follow one member around for an extended period.

 

Just as he makes this decision, he notices an apparently typical woman sitting outside alone.  Mrs. Olsen initiates the conversation, and Burris eagerly tries to gather information.  He finds she is puzzled by his questions, appearing happy, healthy, and well fed.  He is also impressed that she can be content with so little to do.  As he heads for his room, Burris is clearly frustrated, not so much with Walden Two as with his own cynicism that only hard labor could prevent boredom. (Chapter 26)

 

60

 

 

Key Concepts

 

Write a definition for each of these terms.  When in doubt, reread the indicated pages in Walden

Two and consult the glossary in this guidebook.

 

 

 

human engineering, 181

 

 

 

human nature, 182

 

 

 

indoctrination, 191

 

 

 

propaganda, 194

 

 

 

objective sampling, 197

 

 

 

longitudinal study, 203

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

61

 

 

Illustrations

 

The concepts in Walden Two are often illustrated in daily life.  Below are students' illustrations of three concepts in this unit.  Supply additional examples yourself of these or other key concepts in this unit.

 

Human engineering (181).  "A few years ago a mall was built in my hometown.  It was seen as a new concept in shopping for that area and became extremely popular very quickly.  Its shape is somewhat like that of a snake with smooth curves and no sharp corners.  Thus, it seems small and cozy, without long halls.  The shops themselves vary greatly in both size and content.  One can find small specialty boutiques and right around the corner a major department store.  And, un­common to most stores, the Mall extends its hours and is open seven days a week.  During the holidays, decorations add a 'home-like' atmosphere, and continual shows and displays make the mall more than a place to shop.  With these benefits, people actually enjoy the Mall as a place to visit, relax, and meet friends, as well."

 

Human nature (182).  "What is your view of human nature?  Are we innately good or innately evil?  My answer is: 'Neither.' Our personalities are largely what the environment makes us.

 

"No one can run an experiment of this sort, but I think the difference between my ethnic, home­town friends and my school friends says something.  Their two environments seem to produce somewhat different types of people, with different habits and interests.

 

"My home-town friends love their environment with no exams, no special deadlines.  At the end of the workday, we begin an evening of fun and relaxation, in a sort of ethnic style, and the most essential part is being with friends.  The atmosphere is relaxed, and we get together simply to be with each other, to talk and think together, discussing the humor-and problems-of the day.  There is an implicit acceptance of the idea that to be with friends is the most significant part of life, certainly more important than individual accomplishments.

 

"Here at school the environment is almost the opposite.  We get together for fun, but the at­mosphere is chiefly competitive, or at least the work ethic prevails.  We study for exams, read books at great length, write papers, compete on teams, compete for positions on school activities and the like, often until midnight or afterward.  Evenings are devoted to 'getting ahead.' The motiva­tion is for personal achievement, more than for friends.  The focus in on the individual, more than the group.

 

"Exceptions exist, of course.  My ethnic friends have certain personal goals and my school friends cherish certain personal relations.  But there is a large, overall difference between these groups, and the environment seems chiefly responsible.  Neither approach is obviously better or worse than the other, but when this idea is extended to the different influences of street gangs and loving families, I find the notion of an inborn human nature very dubious indeed."

 

Indoctrination (191).  "I grew up in an extremely religious environment.

 

"We children were not allowed to see any movies that the elders didn't approve of, and we could not play cards, have friends outside the religion, or go into town alone.  I went to the service on Sundays, church school on Tuesdays, had home studies on Wednesdays, meeting again on Thurs­days, and field service activities on Saturdays.  I was taught that the world would probably end before I turned 12 years old.  I was

62

 

 

 

told that if I had sexual relations with someone before getting married, no one would want me and I couldn't enter into heaven.  We never celebrated any holidays except one and were told that this shouldn't bother us because people should not worship pagan things.

"The women were discouraged from being feminine and from wearing pants.  They were taught to be submissive and passive instead.  The men were taught to be leaders and headstrong.  The members of this community do not vote, smoke, curse, or consider themselves a part of this world except as teachers of the unfortunate many who are misled by the devil.

 

"Due to this indoctrination, they believe the world is basically an evil place, largely to be avoided.  When some members do leave the community, out of protest or for some other reason, they often have considerable difficulty.  Without a balanced perspective, and especially without developing critical thinking, they cannot adjust readily to other ways of life."

 

63

 

 

Study Questions

 

1.     "You can't make progress toward the Good Life by political action!  Not under any current form of government!" says Frazier. What are his reasons for this statement?  In your answer, define what he means by government and politics. (180)

 

 

2.     Frazier says government should be based on the science of human behavior rather than faith in human nature.  Define these two expressions, as he uses them, and indicate the reasons for his position.  State your position. (182)

 

 

3.     Describe the work of the Political Manager in Walden Two.  How does this role differ from that of political campaign managers in our contemporary society? (183)

 

 

4.    What is the chief responsibility of the Manager of Public Relations?  How does he or she carry

       out these responsibilities? What is Frazier's view of this behavior?  Your view? (184-186)

 

 

5.     Describe the ways in which religious practices in Walden Two are like those in the outside world.  Describe the differences.  Be specific. (185)

 

 

6.     Castle asks Frazier how the community would wage war in the case of attack.  What is Frazier's response?  What is your view of his response? (189)

 

 

7.     Engage in a Walden Two detective assignment, showing in the briefest way a connection be­tween a bit of luxury and some instance of poverty.  Do so beginning with a luxurious hotel suite. What arguments can you make on behalf of these circumstances? (192)

 

 

8.     "You can't propagandize and experiment at the same time," says Frazier.  Explain his view.  Do you agree or disagree?  Why? (195)

 

 

9.     Burris decides to sample happiness in Walden Two, stopping at several different stages or alcoves in the Ladder to observe and ask questions.  Does this procedure seem to be an objec­tive, unbiased approach?  If so, why?  If not, why not? (197-202)

 

 

10.     Describe Burris' encounter with Mrs. Olsen.  What does she think of him? What is his reac­tion to her?  What is your reaction to this scene? (204)

 

 

 

64

 

Values Clarification

 

"We've shot our bolt," says Frazier when the group returns from the medical center. “I’m curious to know whether you've been properly impressed."

 

Castle calls the tour a soul-shaking experience.  But he declares that the problem of govern­ment and politics has not been resolved.  Frazier has commented extensively on this issue:

 

1.  On using power in government: "Governments which use force are based upon bad prin­ciples of human engineering." (181)

 

2.  On innate goodness: "We have no truck with philosophies of innate goodness-or evil, either,

for that matter." (182)

 

3.  On voting: "No one of us believes his weight will be felt in a national election." (188)

 

4.  On the dangers of indoctrination: "You can't propagandize and experiment at the same

time." (195)

 

These topics all pertain to government.  Focusing upon Frazier's remarks, indicate the topic which you think he considers most important by writing "FRAZIER" in front of that statement.  Then imagine the choice of the President of the United States or prime minister of some other country.  Write "POLITICIAN" in front of that topic, which may or may not be the same as your choice for Frazier.

 

Prepare a presentation, oral or written, on the ways in which these choices reflect similar or different values.  What other values probably accompany each choice?  What factors influence these values?  Include an explanation of your own viewpoint.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

65

 

Review

 

Castle is resistant to the concept of Walden Two, yet the tours and talks have been unsettling for him.  Reconsider units I through V and for each unit indicate one or two basic values Castle displays.  Then note which of these seem to have been challenged by his experience in the community.

 

 

I. Breaking Away

 

 

 

II. Design of Things

 

 

 

III.  Working, Playing

 

 

 

IV. Raising Children

 

 

 

V. Marriage and the Family

 

 

 

A person's values usually are consistent with one another.  Try to show how there is a consistency or congruence among the values you have cited for Augustine Castle.

 

66